If your use case for Mac hardware is to run arbitrary 圆4 code at high speed in VMs, you should not buy an M1 Mac because that capability does not currently exist. The virtual Mac continues running until you shut it down from inside the guest OS, or when you quit the app. macOSVirtualMachineSampleApp starts the VM and configures a graphical view that you interact with.
None of this is negativity or cynicism towards M1 Macs - it's just the reality of how switching architectures affects virtualization. Launch macOSVirtualMachineSampleApp to run the macOS guest operating system. VirtualBox has no plans to port to ARM and will not work in Rosetta. Other interesting Mac alternatives to VirtualBox are Parallels Desktop, VMware Fusion, UTM and Multipass. Rosetta 2 is designed exclusively for user-mode programs and cannot cooperate with virtualization software to run arbitrary OSes in VMs. If that doesnt suit you, our users have ranked more than 50 alternatives to VirtualBox and 12 are available for Mac so hopefully you can find a suitable replacement. The things OP asked about fundamentally cannot work. The long-term solution is probably going to be running ARM Windows or Linux in a VM and leaning on Rosetta-style compatibility/translation in the client OS to run 圆4 programs.Įdit: Since this is attracting downvotes, maybe it needs some clarification. The answer to all three of your questions is "If you are worried about this, absolutely do not buy an M1 Mac." Rosetta 2 cannot magically turn VirtualBox from a virtualization management system into a high-performance 圆4 emulator.
0 kommentar(er)
